Nucleic Acids: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[CV:NASBPPOLD|NASBPPOLD]] | | [[CV:NASBPPOLD|NASBPPOLD]] | ||
| simple base-pair parameters (OLD implementation) | | simple base-pair parameters (OLD implementation) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[CV:NALSTP|NALSTP]] | | [[CV:NALSTP|NALSTP]] | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[CV:NASSTPOLD|NASSTPOLD]] | | [[CV:NASSTPOLD|NASSTPOLD]] | ||
| simple base-pair step parameters (OLD implementation) | | simple base-pair step parameters (OLD implementation) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[CV:NASBO|NASBO]] | | [[CV:NASBO|NASBO]] | ||
Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
===References=== | ===References=== | ||
* Applications | |||
** Bouchal, T.; Durník, I.; Illík, V.; Réblová, K.; Kulhánek, P. Importance of Base-Pair Opening for Mismatch Recognition. ''Nucleic Acids Res.'' '''2020''', ''48 (20)'', 11322–11334. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa896. | |||
** Ruzicka, M.; Soucek, R.; Kulhanek, P.; Radova, L.; Fajkusova, L.; Reblova, K. Bending of DNA Duplexes with Mutation Motifs. ''DNA Res.'' '''2019''', ''26 (4)'', 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dsz013. | |||
** Spackova, N.; Reblova, K. Role of Inosine-Uracil Base Pairs in the Canonical RNA Duplexes. ''Genes'' '''2018''', ''9 (7)'', 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9070324. | |||
** Ruzicka, M.; Kulhanek, P.; Radova, L.; Cechova, A.; Spackova, N.; Fajkusova, L.; Reblova, K. DNA Mutation Motifs in the Genes Associated with Inherited Diseases. ''PLOS ONE'' '''2017''', ''12 (8)'', e0182377. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182377. | |||
* CEHS Scheme | * CEHS Scheme | ||
** Lu, X. J.; ElHassan, M. A.; Hunter, C. A. Structure and Conformation of Helical Nucleic Acids: Analysis Program (SCHNAaP). ''J. Mol. Biol.'' '''1997''', ''273 (3)'', 668–680. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1997.1346. | ** Lu, X. J.; ElHassan, M. A.; Hunter, C. A. Structure and Conformation of Helical Nucleic Acids: Analysis Program (SCHNAaP). ''J. Mol. Biol.'' '''1997''', ''273 (3)'', 668–680. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1997.1346. |
Latest revision as of 15:13, 21 June 2021
Navigation: Documentation / Collective Variables / Nucleic Acids
Distance
Angle
Coordination
Shape
Special
Energy
Algebra
Collective Variables For Nucleic Acids
Type | Description |
NALBPP | local base-pair parameters |
NASBPP | simple base-pair parameters |
NASBPPOLD | simple base-pair parameters (OLD implementation) |
NALSTP | local base-pair step parameters |
NASSTP | simple base-pair step parameters |
NASSTPOLD | simple base-pair step parameters (OLD implementation) |
NASBO | simple base-pair opening |
NAPBO | primitive base-pair opening |
NABEND | nucleic acid bending |
Base-Pair Parameters
PMFLib offers two variants of the base-pair parameters, local and simple, which both are fully compatible with 3DNA. They differ in the definition of the y-axis and the procedure to calculate six base-pair parameters, i.e., Shear, Stretch, Stagger, Buckle, Propeller, Opening.
The simple version is provided by NASBPP. It uses an explicitly defined y-axis and Buckle, Propeller, Opening parameters are calculated as dihedral angles.
The local version is provided by NALBPP. It uses a y-axis derived from the superimposed reference frames of two nucleobases and all parameters are calculated using the CEHS scheme.
The collective variable NASBO implements simple Opening only and thus it should be a little bit computationally faster than NASBPP.
Base-Pair Step Parameters
PMFLib offers two variants of the base-pair step parameters, local and simple, which both are fully compatible with 3DNA. They differ in the definition of the y-axes, i.e., Shift, Slide, Rise, Tilt, Roll, Twist.
The simple version is provided by NASSTP. It uses explicitly defined y-axes of two base pairs and all parameters are calculated using the CEHS scheme.
The local version is provided by NALSTP. It uses y-axes derived from the superimposed reference frames of four nucleobases and all parameters are calculated using the CEHS scheme.
Reference Frames of Nucleobases
Reference coordinates for nucleobase rings are provided in the following table:
Nucleobase | Ring Atoms | y-axis (BPP) | y-axis (STP) | File |
A | @N9,C8,N7,C5,C6,N1,C2,N3,C4 | @C8 | @C1' | A_ring_only.xyz |
G | @N9,C8,N7,C5,C6,N1,C2,N3,C4 | @C8 | @C1' | G_ring_only.xyz |
C | @N1,C6,C5,C4,N3,C2 | @C6 | @C1' | C_ring_only.xyz |
T | @N1,C6,C5,C4,N3,C2 | @C6 | @C1' | T_ring_only.xyz |
References
- Applications
- Bouchal, T.; Durník, I.; Illík, V.; Réblová, K.; Kulhánek, P. Importance of Base-Pair Opening for Mismatch Recognition. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48 (20), 11322–11334. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa896.
- Ruzicka, M.; Soucek, R.; Kulhanek, P.; Radova, L.; Fajkusova, L.; Reblova, K. Bending of DNA Duplexes with Mutation Motifs. DNA Res. 2019, 26 (4), 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dsz013.
- Spackova, N.; Reblova, K. Role of Inosine-Uracil Base Pairs in the Canonical RNA Duplexes. Genes 2018, 9 (7), 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9070324.
- Ruzicka, M.; Kulhanek, P.; Radova, L.; Cechova, A.; Spackova, N.; Fajkusova, L.; Reblova, K. DNA Mutation Motifs in the Genes Associated with Inherited Diseases. PLOS ONE 2017, 12 (8), e0182377. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182377.
- CEHS Scheme
- Lu, X. J.; ElHassan, M. A.; Hunter, C. A. Structure and Conformation of Helical Nucleic Acids: Analysis Program (SCHNAaP). J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 273 (3), 668–680. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1997.1346.
- 3DNA
- Lu, X.-J.; Olson, W. K. 3DNA: A Versatile, Integrated Software System for the Analysis, Rebuilding and Visualization of Three-Dimensional Nucleic-Acid Structures. Nature Protocols 2008, 3 (7), 1213–1227. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.104.
- Lu, X.-J.; Olson, W. K. 3DNA: A Software Package for the Analysis, Rebuilding and Visualization of Three-Dimensional Nucleic Acid Structures. Nucl. Acids Res. 2003, 31 (17), 5108–5121. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg680.
- Gradients
- Blanc, E.; Paciorek, W. On Planarity and Similarity Restraints. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2001, 34, 480–483. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889801008470.